PokerStars Game #34715897265: Tournament #208244036, $15+$1 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VII (100/200) - 2009/10/30 17:27:28 PT [2009/10/30 20:27:28 ET]
Table '208244036 1' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: Glitlr (2360 in chips)
Seat 2: spimpin8easy (1875 in chips)
Seat 6: cardsoup (2445 in chips)
Seat 8: sunfam (6820 in chips)
Glitlr: posts the ante 25
spimpin8easy: posts the ante 25
cardsoup: posts the ante 25
sunfam: posts the ante 25
Glitlr: posts small blind 100
spimpin8easy: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Glitlr [3s Ah]
cardsoup: folds
sunfam: folds
Glitlr: raises 2135 to 2335 and is all-in
spimpin8easy: calls 1650 and is all-in
Uncalled bet (485) returned to Glitlr
*** FLOP *** [7c Td 2c]
*** TURN *** [7c Td 2c] [7s]
*** RIVER *** [7c Td 2c 7s] [5h]
Glitlr said, "ok"
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Glitlr: shows [3s Ah] (a pair of Sevens)
spimpin8easy: shows [7h 8c] (three of a kind, Sevens)
spimpin8easy collected 3800 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 3800 | Rake 0
Board [7c Td 2c 7s 5h]
Seat 1: Glitlr (small blind) showed [3s Ah] and lost with a pair of Sevens
Seat 2: spimpin8easy (big blind) showed [7h 8c] and won (3800) with three of a kind, Sevens
Seat 6: cardsoup folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: sunfam (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
His call is -2.91 even vs. a 100% range, -5.31 vs 50%, and -5.45 vs 25% (weird, you'd think it be like -8 by now). I mean, ya we will always shove our Ax here. Any no brain, non limptard donkey can do this play everytime. But what's interesting is that if he calls 87off (which is top 70% in wiz) we can only shove top 30. And now our cliche "shove atc" results in 32off being -3.95. Or maybe I shove it cause the other 2 guys who folded are my friends and I'm applying 17th level collusion by dishing out equity to them:). But, heck, I assume that he is calling much less than 70 but calling 87off because omg some guy on TV said connectors were good.

...I'm gonna go out on a limb and say he is a losing player. Glitlr to you, sir.


